You are here

Epileptik EEG işaretlerin aşırı öğrenme makineleri ile sınıflandırılması

Classification of Epileptic EEG Signals by Extreme Learning Machines

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the EEG signals obtained from patients that diagnosed with epilepsy seizure, were classified as before, during and after seizures. EEG signals are the non-linear and non-stationary signals that indicate the electrical activity of the brain. Different from normal situation of the brain, in the abnormal neurological, changes are significantly different in the sub-band of EEG signals, and these changes are signs of neurological disease. Since epilepsy starts the dynamic in the brain changes while the nonlinearity and non-Gaussanity increases in the EEG signal. So, the phase synchronization arises during seizure. During this phase match the features of the EEG signals can be obtained by using bispectrum analysis which is one of the higher order spectral analysis techniques. Bicoherence, as the normalized version of the bispectrum, of EEG signals obtained from eight patients were determined, and quadratic phase coupling (QPC) identified. These features, which is obtained by epileptic EEG signals were fed to the input of the classifier. In terms of providing fast and high accuracy for classification of the EEG signal, the extreme learning machine (ELM) was used. The ELM is a single hidden layer feed-forward neural network. For comparison the artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were also used. In the study, it was shown that the QPCs in the EEG signal increased during epilepsy compared with before epilepsy. This result shows that the complexity and non-Gaussianity increase during epilepsy seizure. By considering the sub-bands of EEG separately, during epilepsy, the ratio of QPC has increased in the low frequency compared to high frequency. In the study it was also shown that the QPC after epilepsy is higher than before epilepsy, however, the QPC after epilepsy is lower than during epilepsy. This suggests that the brain dynamic after epilepsy seizure is more synchronous than before epilepsy seizure. This situation is going on until brain activities became normal. In the study 8 patient’s EEG that were diagnosed with seizure were used. 400 episodes of each pre epilepsy, during epilepsy and after epilepsy were obtained from whole data. A train/test data rate of 50%-50% was used in the classifiers. The test results show that the ELM has higher accuracy than ANN and SVM as shown in the Table 2. By using ELM a high classification accuracy of 98.60% was obtained. For ANN and SVM the test results of %95.33 and %91.25 obtained respectively. Furthermore, it was also shown that the ELM is much faster than ANN and SVM classifiers. This study is thought to help neurologists in the diagnosis of epilepsy.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada Epilepsi tanısı konulmuş hastalardan alınan EEG işaretleri, nöbet öncesi, nöbet anı ve nöbet sonrası olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. EEG işaretleri lineer ve durağan olmayan işaretler olup beynin elektriksel aktivitelerini gösterirler. Nörolojik anormallerde EEG işaretlerin alt bantlarında normal durumdan farklı olarak belirgin değişimler gözlemlenmekte ve bu değişimler nörolojik hastalıkların belirtisi olmaktadır. Epilepsi gibi nörolojik hastalıklarda EEG işaretleri içerisindeki bantlarda normal durumdan farklı olarak bir faz senkronizasyonu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu faz eşleşmelerini yüksek dereceden spektral analizi tekniklerinden olan ikiz spektrum analizi ile ortaya çıkararak EEG işareti içerisinden özelikler elde edilebilmektedir. Elde edilen bu özelliklerin bir sınıflandırıcının girişine verilmesi ile epileptik EEG işaretleri sınıflandırılmaktadır. Çalışmada hızlı ve yüksek doğruluk sağlaması açısından sınıflandırıcı olarak aşırı öğrenme makineleri kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan bu yöntem ile %98,60 gibi yüksek bir doğrulukla sınıflandırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın nörologlara epilepsi tanısında yardımcı olacağı düşünülmektedir.
481
490

REFERENCES

References: 

Chandran, V., Elgar, S.L., (1991). Mean and
variance of estimates of the bispectrum of a
harmonic random process—an analysis
including leakage effects, IEEE Trans. on
Signal Processing, 39, 2640– 51.
Chandran, V.,Elgar, S.L., (1993). ―Pattern
recognition using invariants defined from higher
order spectra—1-D inputs‖, IEEE Transactions
on Signal Processing,41, 205–11.
Chandran, V.,Carswell, B., Boashash, B., Elgar,S.L.,
(1997). ―Pattern recognition using invariants
defined from higher order spectra: 2-D image
inputs‖, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 6, 5,
703–12.
Chandran V, Elgar SL, Pezeshki C. , (1993).
―Bispectral and trispectral characterization of
transition to chaos in the duffing oscillator‖, Int.
Journal of Bifurcationand Chaos, 3, 3, 551–7.
Chua, K.C., Chandran, V., Acharya, U.R.,
Lim,V.M., (2010) ―Application of higher order
statistics / spectra in biomedical signals‖,
Medical Eng. & Physics, 32, 679– 689.
Ertuğrul, Ö.F., Kaya, Y., (2014). ―A detailedanalysis
on extreme learning machine and novel
approaches based on ELM‖, American J. of
Computer Science and Eng. 1, 5, 43-50.
Hasselman, K.,Munk, W., MacDonald, G., (1963).
―Bispectra of oceanwaves‖, In: Rosenblatt M,
editor. Time series analysis. New York: Wiley,
125–39.
Hinich, M.J. ve Clay, C.S., (1968). ―The application
of the discrete Fourier transform in the estimation
of power spectra, coherence and bispectra of
geophysical data‖, Reviews of Geophysics, 6, 3,
347-363.
Huang, G.B., Zhu, Q.Y. &Siew, C.K., (2006).
―Extreme learning machine: theory and
applications‖, Neurocomputing, 70, 1-3 ,489-501.
Huber, P. J., Kleiner, B., Gasser, T. & Dumermuth,
G., (1971). ―Statistical methods for
investigating phase relations in stationary
stochastic processes‖, IEEE Trans. on Audio
Electroacoust, 78– 86.
Kaya, Y., Ertuğrul, Ö.F.ve Tekin, R., (2014). ―An
Expert Spam Detection System Based on
Extreme Learning Machine‖, Computer Science
and Applications, 1, 2, 133- 138.
Khadra, L., Al-Fahoum, A.S., Binajjaj, S., (2005).
―A quantitative analysis approach for cardiac
arrhythmia classification using higher order
spectral techniques‖. IEEE Transactionson
Biomedical Engineering, 52, 11, 1840–5.
Muthuswamy J, Sherman D, Thakor NV., (1999).
―Higher order spectral analysis of EEG burst
patterns during asphyxicinjury‖, IEEE Trans.
on Biomedical Engineering, 46, 1, 92–9.
Nikias, C.L. ve Petropulu, A.P., (1993). ―Higher
order spectral analysis: A nonlinear signal
processing framework‖, Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Ning, T. ve Bronzino, J.D., (1989). ―Bispectral
analysis of the rat EEG during various vigilance
states‖, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 36, 4, 497–499.
488
N. Sezgin
Raghuveer, M.R. ve Nikias, C.L., (1985).
―Bispectrum estimation: A paramet-ricapproach‖,
IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing,
33, 4, 1113-1230.
Sezgin, N.,Tagluk, M.E., Akin, M., (2010). ―Using
bispectral analysis in OSAS estimation‖. IEEE
18th Signal Processing and Communications
Applications Conference, 89 – 92, 22-24
April, Diyarbakır.
Sigl, J.C. ve Chamoun, N.G., (1994). ―An
introduction of bispectral analysis for the
electroencephalogram‖, Journal of Clinical
Monitoring, 10, 6, 392-404.
Suresh, S., Saraswathi, S. &Sundararajan, N.,
(2010). ―Performance enhancement of extreme
learning machine for multi-category sparse data
classification problems‖, Eng Applications of
Artificial Intelligence, 23, 1149-1157, 2010.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com