You are here

Home » Content

İKİ FARKLİ DENTİN ADEZİVİN KOMPOZÎTLERİ DENTİNE BAĞLAMA DAYANİKLİLİĞİNİN KARŞİLAŞTRİLMASİ

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2001

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this in vitro study,the dentin bonding performance of two different adhesive systems (4 th and 5 th generation! were compared by using shear bond strength lest. The buccal dentinal surfaces of 64 extracted human molar teeth were used. The teeth were parted in four groups and two different hybrid composites were applied in combination with two different adhcsivcs.Thc samples were exposed to shear force at universal test machine. The data obtained were statistically analysed by using analysis of variance and 1.SI3 Lest. As a result, two bottle smear layer removing system (4lh generation system) showed statistically significantly better bunding performance than single bottle smear layer removing system (5 th generation system).
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu in vjfro çalışmada iki farklı dentin adezivin (4. nesi] ve .">.nesil) iki farkfı marka hibrid kompozil rezim dentine bağlama dayanıklılığı kesme tipi kuvvet uygulanarak saptandı. Hu amaçla 64 adet çekilmiş insan molar dişinin bukkal dentin yüzeyleri kullanıldı. Dişler dört gruba ayrılarak iki farklı adeziv (Scolchbond MP, 3M ; Prime& Bond 2.1, Dentsply) iki farklı kompoziL (TPH Spectrum. Dcntsply ; Tetric ('eram. Vivadcntl ile kombine edilerek uygulandı. Örnekler universal Lest makınasında kesme lipi kuvvete maruz bırakıldı.Tildc edilen değerler varyans analı/i vc LSD testi ile istatistiksel olarak analiz, edildi. Sonuçta kullanılan konıpozitlen bağımsı? olarak, 4. Nesil olarak da adlandırılan, smear tabakasını tamamen kaldıran iki şişeli adeziv sistemin, tek şişeli sistemden istatistiksel olarak daha iyi bağlanma değeri sağladığı saptandı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-iki-farkli-dentin-adezivin-kompozitleri-dentine-baglama-dayanikliliginin-karsilastrilmasi.pdf
  • 2
34-37
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Buonocore MG.
A
simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces .1 Dent Res 34:M9~853,I955.
2- Avcry JK, Dentin. In: Bhaskar SN, ed.Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology. St.Louis :Mosby Year Book,l06-l38,199J
3- Torneck CD Dentin Pulp Complexm:teneale AR, ed Oral Histology,Developmcnt .Structure and Function.St.l,ouis:C.V. Mosby.157-196,1989.
4- Lotra AM, Barkmeier WW. Dental adhesives in contemporary restorative denlislry.Dcnt Clin North America 42(4):;>67-577v1998.
5- Kngel G .Ferrari M. The science of bonding:from first to sixth gcneratiunJADA 131:20-252000.
6- Van Meerbeek Fî, Perdiago J, Lambrcchts P, Vanherle G. the clinical performance of adhesives J Dent 26;1-20J1998.
7- Nakabayashi NvKojıma K,Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265-273,1982.
8- Duke SH.Adhcsive bonding directions:Where are tilings going7Comp Com Edit 20(4 1): 1010-1013,1999
9- AI-Salehi SKJÎttrke FJT. Methods used in dentin bonding tc&ts;An analysis of 5Q investigations on bond slrcngth.Quint Inl 28:717-723,1997.
36
Atatürk Üniv.Dış
Hek.Fak,Derg
. Ciltli, Sayr.2, Sayfa:34-372001
KİREMİTÇİ. HÜRMİ'JZLÜ
f0-Sano H, Shımo T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B ct al- Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength, evaluation of a mıcrolenüile bond lest. Dent Mater 10,236-240,1994.
11 Tanumiharja MJJurrow MF,Tyas ML Microtcnsiie bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Maler 16; 180 187,2000.
12- PashIcy DH.Carvaliio RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion J Dent 25:355-372,1997.
13- Sano H, Tahatsu T, Ciucchi B, Russel CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineraii/cd human dentin, J Dent Res 74:1093-1102,1995.
14- Bouiltaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M cl al. Bond strength of composite to dentin usinj; conventional, one-step, and scli-elchiııg adhesive systems. J Dent 2935-612001.
15- Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M.Yoshida Y, fiimbrechts \' et al. Adhesion mechanism of sc!f'-etching adhesives. fn :Advtinced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium, 1999. First Edition, Jlafy 2000:130- I4S.
16- Barkmeier WW, Elammesfabr PD, Latta MA. Bond strensîth of composite to enamel and dentin using Prime& Bond 2.1 Oper Dent 24:51-56,1990.
17- AJpcggiani M.Gagliaııi M,Re D, Sıhirıi S-Operator influence using adhesive systems : one bottle vs.multi bottles (abstract) J Dent Res {Spec Lss} 77:942,1998
18- finger WJ, Barkenhol M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone based one bottle adhesive. J Adhcs ftent İ(4);311 -4,1999.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com