Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

HAVA SAVUNMA SEKTÖRÜ TEZGAH YATIRIM PROJELERİNİN BULANIK ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSESİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT PROJECTS IN AIR DEFENCE SECTOR BY FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Journal Name:

  • Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, an evaluation model was developed to prioritize the investment projects of the Air Supply and Maintenance Centers. These equipment procurement projects are requested for serving in repair and maintenance for the air force military systems. In order to state accurately the linguistic uncertainty in the pairwise comparison judgements of the alternatives, the Chang’s Extent Analysis Method[3] which is one of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) techniques, has been used as a priorizitation method. The project alternatives have been compared with each other in terms of totally fifteen sub-criteria which were hierarchically related to the four main criteria: potential contribution of the project to the air force lojistic system, economics of the project, risks through the project and technological contribution of the equipment. The candidate projects were compared by qualified experts’ through the querries. Differently from the other Chang’s method implimentations, the geometric average technique was performed to calculate the fuzzy weights, and also two different fuzzy comparison scales were used in this paper.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, hava savunmasında kullanılan askerî sistemlerin bakım ve onarımı konusunda hizmet veren Hava İkmal Bakım Merkezlerinin (HİBM) tezgah yatırım proje tekliflerinin önceliklendirilmesi için bir değerlendirme modeli geliştirilmiştir. Çok kriterli değerlendirmede, ikili karşılaştırma yargılarındaki sözel belirsizliği daha iyi ifade etmek amacıyla, Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (Bulanık AHP) tekniklerinden biri olan Chang’ın Mertebe Analiz Yöntemi[3] kullanılmıştır. Proje alternatifleri, projenin hava lojistik sisteme potansiyel katkısı, projenin ekonomikliği, projenin gerçekleşmesinde karşılaşılan riskler ve tedarik edilecek tezgahların teknolojisi olarak dört ana kriter kapsamında toplam 15 adet alt kriter üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Yöntemin aritmetik işlemlerine girdi niteliğindeki ikili karşılaştırma yargıları, konusunda uzman personele yapılan anketler yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Bu makalede, bulanık ağırlıklar hesaplanırken diğer Chang yöntemi uygulamalarından farklı olarak geometrik ortalama kullanılmış ve kriterler-alternatifler için ayrı ayrı olmak üzere iki bulanık karşılaştırma derecelendirmesinden faydalanılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-hava-savunma-sektoru-tezgah-yatirim-projelerinin-bulanik-analitik-hiyerarsi-prosesi-ile-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 4
23
33
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Laarhoven, P.J.M. ve Pedrycz W., (1983) “A
fuzzy extension of saaty’s priority theory”, Fuzzy Sets
and Systems, 229–241.
[2] Buckley, J.J., (1985) “Fuzzy hierarchical
analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 233–247.
[3] Chang, D.Y., (1996) “Applications of the
extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649–655.
[4] Wang Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S. ve Hua, Z., (2006)
“A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method
for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 3055-3071.
[5] Xu, R., (2000) “Fuzzy least square priority
method in the analytic hierarchy process”, Fuzzy Sets
and Systems, 395-404.
[6] Mikhailov, L., (2003) Deriving priorities from
fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements, Fuzzy Sets
and Systems, 365 -385.
[7] Cheng, C.H., (1996) “Evaluating naval tactical
missile systems by fuzzy ahp based on the grade
value of membership function”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 343–350.
[8] Lee, M., Pham, H. ve Zhang, X., (1999) “A
methodology for priority setting with application to
software development process”, European Journal of
Operational Research,118: 375–389.
[9] Leung, L.C. ve Cao, D., (2000) “On
consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy ahp”,
European Journal of Operational Research, 102–113.
[10] Kuo, M.S., Liang, G.S. ve Huang W.C., (2006)
“Extensions of the multicriteria analysis with pairwise
comparison under a fuzzy environment”, International
Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 268-285.
[11] Gu, X. ve Zhu, Q., (2006) “Fuzzy multiattribute
decision-making method based on
eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space”,
Decision Support Systems, 400-410.
[12] Kwong, C.K. ve Bai, H. (2003) “Determining
the importance weights for the customer requirements
in qfd using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis
approach”, IEEE Transactions, 619-626.
[13] Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. ve Ulukan, Z., (2003)
“Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP”,
Logistics Information Management, 382-394.
[14] Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. ve Ruan, D., (2004)
“Multi-attribute comparison of catering service
companies using fuzzy ahp: the case of Turkey”,
International Journal of Production Economics, 171–
184.
[15] Bozdağ, C. E., Kahraman, C. ve Ruan, D.,
(2003) “Fuzzy group decision making for selection
among computer integrated manufacturing systems”,
Computers in Industry, 13–29.
[16] Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C. ve Ruan, D.,
(2004) “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for
software development strategy selection”,
International Journal of General Systems, 259–280.
[17] Tang Y.C. ve Beynon M.J., (2005)
“Application and development of a fuzzy analytic
hierarchy process within a capital investment study”,
Journal of Economics and Management, 207-230.
[18] Bozbura, F.T. ve Beskese, A., (2007)
“Prioritization of organizational capital measurement
indicators using fuzzy ahp”, International Journal of
Approximate Reasoning, 44: 124–147.
Hava Savunma Sektörü Tezgah Yatırım Projelerinin Bulanık AHP ile Değerlendirilmesi
KAPLAN, ARIKAN
33
[19] Bozbura, F.T., Beskese, A. ve Kahraman, C.,
(2007) “Prioritization of human capital measurement
indicators using fuzzy ahp”, Expert Systems with
Applications, 1-13.
[20] Akman, G. ve Alkan, A., (2006) “Tedarik
zinciri yönetiminde bulanık ahp yöntemi kullanılarak
tedarikçilerin performansının ölçülmesi: otomotiv yan
sanayiinde bir uygulama”, İstanbul Ticaret
Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 23-46.
[21] Chan, F.T.S. ve Kumar, N., (2007) “Global
supplier development considering risk factors using
fuzzy extended ahp-based approach”, Omega, 35 (4):
417-431.
[22] Erensal , Y.C., Öncan, T. ve Demircan, M.L.,
(2006) “Determining key capabilities in technology
management using fuzzy analytic process: a case
study of Turkey”, Information Sciences, 2755–2770.
[23] Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., ve Hua Z., (2008) “On
the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its
applications”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 186(2), 735-747.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com