CONTENT ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH PROJECTS SUBMITTED BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS (2000-2009) AT THE ZIMBABWE OPEN UNIVERSITY: Implications for Quality Assessment
Bogdan R. C. & Biklen S. K. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education. Boston Allyn and Bacon.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research. White Plains. N Y. Longman.
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching. Chicago, Rand McNally.
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Skokie, I L. Rand McNally.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, Rand McNally.
Dellana, S., Collins, W. & West, D. (2000). Online education in a management science course-effectiveness and performance factors. Journal of Education for Business, 76,43-48.
DeSantis, C. (2002). ELearners.com. Retrieved November 2, 2002, http:// elearners. Com
Dodds, A. E., Lawrence, J. A. & Guiton, P. (1994). University students‘ perceptions of influences on external study. Distance Education, 5(2), 174-185.
Filstead, W. J. (1970). Qualitative Methodology. Chicago: Markham. Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm Wars and their Aftermath. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
Gall, M., Borg, W. & Gall, J. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
Guba, E. G. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Monograph 8. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Greene, J., and Caracelli, V. J. (2002). Making paradimatic sense of mixed methods practice. Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.
Hedrick, T. E., Bickman, L. & Rog D. (1993). Applied Research design: A practical Guide: Newbury Park. C A: Sage.
Kangai, C. V. & Mapolisa, T. (2008). Citation analysis of research projects submitted by Bachelor of Education (EAPPS) students‘ (2000-2004) to the department of education at the Zimbabwe Open University: Implications for educators and librarians.
Kember, D. & Dekkers J. (1987). The role of study centres for academic support, Distance Education, 8 (1), 4-17.
Krathwohl, D. R. (1985). Methods of Educational and Social Science Research. White Plains. N Y. Longmans.
Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in Educational Research: Feminist and post structural perspectives: Theory and Practice.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage. Moon, S., Dillon, D., & Sprenkle, D. (1990). Family therapy and qualitative research.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. Thousand Oaks C A: Sage.
Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the Social Sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of philosophy of formalism. Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (1993). Research in Education: A Conceptual introduction, 3 th Edition. Happer, Collins College Publishers.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrative diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. 2nd Edition London. Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B. (1983). Qualitative dataas an attracive nuisance: The problem of analysis. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Myrdal, S. (1994). Teacher education on line: What gets lost in electronic communication; Educational measurement: Issues and practice.
Nyawaranda, V. A. (2005). Supervising Research Projects/ Dissertations. A Paper delivered at the Zou Workshop in Mashonaland Central Region. Bindura.
Osman, R. & Wagner G. A. (1987). New Zealand management students‘ perceptions of communicationtechnologies in correspondents education. Distance Education, 8(1), 47-63.
Owens, R. (1982). Methodological rigor in naturalistic inquiry: Some issues and answers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(2), 1-21.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, C.A: California, Sage.
Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Ed.), Distance education: Interenationalperspective (pp.34-35) New York: Routledge.
Phipps, R. & Merisotis, J. (1999). What‘s the Difference? A review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education in Higher Education. The institute for Higher Education policy.
Reckase, M. D. (1995). Portifolio assessment: A theoretical estimate of score reliability.
Russek, B. E. & Weinberg, S. L. (1993). Mixed methods in a study of implementation of technology-based materials in the elementary classroom. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16 (2), 131-142.
Russell,, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Schwandt, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative enquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics and Social Constructionism. Beverly Hills, C A: Sage.
Smith, R. B. & Manning, p. K. (1982). A Handbook of social science methods, volume 2: Qualitative methods. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Straus, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in Social and Behavioural Sciences. Thousand Oaks, C A: Sage.