NOMİNAL GRUP TEKNİĞİ: "ÖĞRENCİLER ÇEVRE VE EĞİTİM DERSİNİ NEDEN SEÇTİLER?"
|Author Name||University of Author||Faculty of Author|
Keywords (Original Language):
Murphy,R.(1996). The nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students'teaching and
learning experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 147-159. Delbecq, A.L. & Van De Ven, A.H. (1971). A group procesess model for problem identification and program
planning. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science,17,466-492. Delbecq, A.L.,Van De Ven, A.H. & Gustafson, D.H. (1975). Group Techniques for program Planning, Scott;
Foresman and Company, Glenview;IL Denscompe, M. (1995). Explorations in group interviews: an evaluation of a reflexive and partisan approach. British
Educational Research Journal, 21, 131-148. Farone, M.C., Hall, E.W. & Costello, J.J. (1998). Postsecondary disability issues: an inclusive identification strategy.
Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13, 35-45. Frantz, N.R. (1997). The identification of national trends and issues for workplace preparation and their implications
for vocational teacher education. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education. 14, 8-19. Freston, W.A. (1987). Meaning in method: the rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational
Research, 16(7), 16-21.
Fuller, I., Gaskın, S. & Scott, I. (2003). Student perceptions of geography and environmental sciences fieldwork in the light of restricted access to the field, caused by the foot and mouth disease in the UK in 2001. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 197-208
Gaskin, S. (2003). A guide to nominal group technigue (NGT) in focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27 (3), 341-347.
Gerdes, K.E. & Benson, R.A. (1995). Problems of inner-city schoolchildren: needs assessment by nominal group
process. Social Work in Education, 17, 139-147. O'Neil, M.J. (1981). Nominal group technique: an evaluation data collecting process. Evaluation Newsletter, 5(2),44-
Lomax, P. & McLeman, P. (1983). The uses and abuses of nominal group technique in polytechnic course evaluation.
Studies in Higher Education, 9 (2), 183-190 MacPhail, A. (2001). Nominal group technique: a useful method for working with young people. British Educational
Research Journal, 27(2), 161-170. O'Neil, M.J. & Jackson, L.(1983). Nominal group technique: a process for initiating curriculum development in
higher education. Studies In Higher Education, 8(2), 129-138. Rossman, G.B. & Wilson, B.L. (1985). Numbers and words. Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a
single large-scale evaluation study. Educational Review, 9, 627-643. Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: the analytic and systemic approaches to
educational research. Educational Researcher, 20 (6), 10-18. Watts, M., Ebbut, D. (1987). More than the sum of the parts: research methods in group interviewing. British
Educational Research Journal, 13, 25-34. Wilson,V. (1997). Focus groups: a useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research
Journal, 23, 209-224.
Zastrow, C. & Navarre, R. (1977). The nominal Group: a new tool for making social work education relevant. Journal of Education for Social Work, 13, 112-118.