You are here

Measuring efficiency of lean six sigma project implementation using data envelopment analysis at NASA


Journal Name:


Publication Year:


Sayfa Aralığı:: 

Publication Language:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: This study aims to review the implementation of the Lean Six Sigma project methodology in the Johnson Space Center (JSC) business environment of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with an objective of evaluating performance of individual projects and to develop recommendation for strategies to improve operational efficiencies based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Design/methodology/approach: In this study, authors propose the Lean Six Sigma project performance evaluation model (LSS-PPEM) based on Data DEA where Critical Success Factors (CSFs) and Total Team Hours serve as inputs while Process Sigma and Cost avoidance are used as outputs. The CSFs are factors that critically affect the performance of LSS at JSC. Six of those are identified by the Black Belts through Analytical Hierarchical Process, and the values of those are decided by project leaders and Green Belts through survey. Eighteen LSS projects are evaluated, and their results are analyzed. Findings: Eventually, four out of the six CSFs are adopted for this study based upon Pearson correlation analysis, and those four include Project execution and follow up of results; Top management’s commitment and participation; The use of data analysis with easily obtainable data; Attention given to both long and short term targets. Using data between the years 2009 and 2011, seven of the eighteen projects are found to be efficient. The benchmark analysis and slack analysis are conducted to provide further recommendation for JSC managers. Three out of those seven efficient projects are most frequently used as an efficient peer. Practical implications: Traditionally, DEA has been considered as a data-driven approach. In this study, authors incorporate the survey-based CSFs into the DEA frame. Since many organizations may have different CSFs, the framework presented in this study can be easily applied to other organizations. Originality/value: This study provides a DEA-based framework and case study of LSS project evaluation in the government sector, which is very unique application to author’s best knowledge. The framework is unique in terms of its input factor selection and quantification procedures.



Bicheno, J. (2001). Manufacturing operations and supply chain management: The LEAN
approach. In Taylor, D. and Brunt, D., (Ed.). Kaizen and Kaikaku. London, UK: Thomson
Learning, pp. 175-184.
Bissell, D., Garcia, M., & Telles, D. (2006). Lean Implementation at White Sands Missile Range:
A Case Study of Lean Thinking Applied in a Government Organization. Master Thesis, Naval
Postgraduate School.
Bo, C.P. (2005). Performance evaluation of data envelopment analysis. Wu-Nan Book Inc.,
Bodek, N. (2002). Quick and Easy Kaizen. IIE Solutions, 34(7), 43-45.
Boynton, A., & Zmud, R. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management
Review, 25(4), 17-27.
Brotherton, B., & Shaw, J. (1996). Towards an identification and classification of critical success
factors in UK hotels plc. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 15(2), 113-135.
Burton, T.T., & Sams, J.L. (2005). Six Sigma for Small and Mid-sized Organizations. Florida: J.
Ross Publishing.
Choo, A., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. (2007). Method and context perspectives on learning
and knowledge creation in quality management. Journal of Operations Management, 25,
Cooper, W., Seiford, L.M., & Shu, J. (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New
York: Springer-Verlag.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive
text with models, applications, references, and DEA-solver software. Boston, Mass.; London:
Kluwer Academic.
Coronado, R., & Antony, J. (2002). Critical Success Factors for the Successful Implementation
of Six Sigma projects in Organizations. The TQM Magazine, 14(2), 92-99.
Eliat, H. Golany, B., & Shtub, A. (2008). R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and
Balanced Scorecard approach. Omega, 35(5), 895-912.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B.R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and
productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. SocioEconomic Planning Sciences, 4(3), 151-157.
Ferris, J.A., Groesbeck, R.I. Aken, E.M.V., & Letens, G. (2006). Evaluating the relative
performance of engineering design projects: A case study using Data Envelopment Analysis.
IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 53(3), 471-482.
Feng, Q., & Antony, J. (2009). Integrating DEA into six sigma methodology for measuring
health service efficiency. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1112-1121.
Furterer, S. (2004). A framework roadmap for implementing Lean Six Sigma in local
governmental entities. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida.
George, M.L. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hayes, B.J. (2002). Six sigma critical success factors, retrieved 12 February 2012 from
Ho, Y., Chang, O., & Wang, W. (2008). An empirical study of key success factors for six sigma
green belt projects at an Asian MRO company. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(5),
Kirby, K., & Greene, B. (2003). How Value Stream Type Affects the Adoption of Lean
Production Tools and Techniques. Proceedings of the 2003 Industrial Engineering and
Research Conference.
Kumar, U. D., Saranga, H., Ramírez-Márquez, J. E., & Nowicki, D. (2007). Six sigma project
selection using data envelopment analysis. The TQM Magazine, 19(5), 419-441.
Kwak, Y., & Anbari, F. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach.
Technovation, 26, 708-715.
Lengacher, D. (2010). Calculating the efficiency of process improvement. iSixSigma Magazine,
6(6), 56-57.
Linton, J.D., Morabito, J., & Yeomans, J.S. (2007). An Extension to a DEA support system used
for assessing R&D projects. R&D Management, 37(1), 29-36.
Malhotra, R., Malhotra, D.K., & Lermack, H. (2009). Using data envelopment analysis to
analyze the performance of North American class I freight railroads. Applications of
Management Science, 13, 113-131.
Melnyk, S.A., Calantone, R.J., Montabon, F.L., & Smith, R.T. (1998). Short-term action in
pursuit of long- term improvements: introducing Kaizen events. Production and Inventory
Management Journal, 39(4), 69-76.
Oakeson, M. (1997). Kaizen Makes Dollars & Sense for Mercedes-Benz in Brazil. IIE Solutions,
29(4), 32-35.
Rockart, J. (1979). Chief Executives Define Their Own Information Needs. Harvard Business
Review, 2, 81-92.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill.
Schroeder, R.G., Lindermana, K., Liedtkeb, C., & Choo, A.S. (2008). Six Sigma: definition and
underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26, 536-554.
Smith, B. (2003). Lean and Six Sigma: A One-Two Punch. Quality Progress, April 2003.
Su, C., & Chou, C. (2008). A systematic methodology for the creation of six sigma projects: A
case study of semiconductor foundry. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2693-2703.
Vasilash, G.S. (1997). Getting Better-Fast. Automotive Design & Production, 109(8), 66-68.
Yüksel, H. (2012). Evaluation of the success of Six Sigma Projects by Data Envelopment
Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(13), 75-83.
Zu, X., Fredendall, L., & Douglas, T. (2008). The evolving theory of quality management: The
role of six sigma. Journal of operations Management, 26, 630-650.

Thank you for copying data from