You are here


Author NameUniversity of Author

Journal Name:


Publication Year:


Sayfa Aralığı:: 

Publication Language:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Almost everywhere in the world, higher education witnesses increasingly diverse student population which has become a challenge. Such diversity is looked up as a real problem that faces instructors at higher education. Indeed, numerous studies have shown that this issue has to be addressed properly by higher education institutions (universities and colleges) and therefore, work very hard if not to eliminate it, at least to decrease it. This means that all students regardless of their differences from the mainstream have to be included, taking their rights like the others. At Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), the issue of diversity among students comes to classes in different fashions each semester. With students from all the regions of the Sultanate beside a number of them from around the world, classes at SQU see different types of students who possess almost unlike characteristics. As it is clear, the issue of diversity at SQU is not different from the other universities in the world. The main purpose of the paper was to deal with my classroom at Sultan Qaboos University, college of education in Oman as a case study using UDL. This paper presented the potentiality of applying what is called universal design for learning (UDL) in university courses. The revolutionary idea of UD worked to design spaces, products, and services that met the needs of the widest range of diverse individuals who used these services.



Burgstahler, S. (2006). Equal access: Universal design of instruction. Seattle: DO-IT, University of Washington.
Available from Brochures/Academics/equal_access_udi.html
Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2001). Universal design for learning. Retrieved October 10,
2009, from
Coyne, P., Ganley, P., Hall, T., Meo, G., Murray, E., & Gordon, D. (2006). Applying universal design for learning
in the classroom. In D. H. Rose & A. Meyer (Eds.), A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard Education Press.
Hitchcock, C., & Stahl, S. (2004). Assistive technology, universal design, universal design for learning: Improved
learning outcomes. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 45-52.
Kortering, J., McClannon, W., & Braziel, M. (2008). Universal design for learning: A look at what algebra and
biology students with and without high incidence conditions are saying. Remedial and Special Education, 29 (6),
352- 363.
Meyer, A. & Rose, D. H. (2002). The future in the margins: The role of technology and diability in educational
reform. In D. H. Rose, A. Meyer, & C. Hitchcock (Eds.), The universally designed classroom: Accessible and
digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Pace, D. & Schwartz, D. (2008). Accessibility in post secondary education: Application of UDL to college
curriculum. US-China Education Review, 12 (5), 20-26.
Pliner S. M. & Johnson, J. R. (2004). Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional
design in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37 (2), 105-113.
Rose, D. H. & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning.
Alexandria, VA. Available from
Rose, D. H. (2001). Universal design for learning: Deriving guiding principles from networks that learn. Journal
of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 66-67.
Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2001). Principles of Universal Design for Instruction. Storrs, CT:
University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M.,&Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult
instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369-379.

Thank you for copying data from