You are here

Öğretim Elemanlarının Kullandıkları Güç Kaynakları ile Öğretmen Adaylarının Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeleri Arasındaki İlişki: İç Motivasyonun Aracılık Rolü

Share
The Relationship between the Power Sources of the Lectures and the Organizational Identification of the Prospective Teachers: The Mediator Role of the Intrinsic Motivation
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author

Journal Name:

Volume:

Publication Year:

Number:

Page Number-First: 
269
Page Number-Last: 
297

Publication Language:

Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretim elemanlarının kullandıkları güç kaynaklarının, öğretmen adaylarında iç motivasyon ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin yordayıcısı olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Veriler Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesinde okuyan 720 öğretmen adayına uygulanan anketler sonucunda elde edilmiştir. Araştırmada Öğretim Elemanı Güç Kullanımı Ölçeği, İç Motivasyon Ölçeği ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ortalama, standart sapma, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı ve Regresyon Analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar kullanılan güç kaynaklarının bazı boyutlarının iç motivasyon ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ile ve iç motivasyonun ise örgütsel özdeşleşme ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Yine sonuçlar, iç motivasyonun, kullanılan güç kaynaklarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this research is to determine whether power sources used by the lectures are predictors of intrinsic motivation and organizational identification of prospective teachers. Data was collected with the help of a survey conducted on 720 prospective teachers, studying at Gazi University. In this research, the data was collected by using a “Lectures Power Use Scale, a” Intrinsic Motivation” and a “Organizational Identification Scale”. In the analyses of the data, mean, standard deviation, Pearson Moments Product Correlation Coefficient and Regression Analysis were used. The results indicated a significant positive relation between some dimensions of power sources and intrinsic motivation and organizational identification, in addition between intrinsic motivation and organizational identification. Results also indicate that intrinsic motivation has a mediator role in power sources effects on organizational identification.

REFERENCES

References: 

Arends, R. I. (2004). Learning to Teach, Sixth Edition. Boston :McGraw Hill.
Ashforth, B. E., and Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Cameron, J., Pierce, W. D., Banko, K. M., and Gear, A. (2005). Achievement-Based Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: A Test of Cognitive Mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 641-655.
Celep, C. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Adanma ve Öğretmenler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Çelik, V. (2005). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Chan, S. H. (2006). Organizational identification and commitment of members of a human development organization, Journal of Management Development, 25 (3), 249-268.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta–analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: a conceptual and operational review. Journal of Management Reviews, 7 (4), 207-230.
Eggen, P., and Kauchak, D. (1997). Educational Psychology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. s. 42.
Öğretim Elemanlarının Kullandıkları Güç Kaynakları…
288
Fichter, J. (2004). Sosyoloji Nedir? (Çev. : Nilgün Çelebi) Ankara: Arı Yayıncılık.
French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. (1968). The bases for social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power LPP. 150-167. Ann Arbor, M1: University of Michigan Press.
Gıblın, L. (2004). İnsan İlişkilerinde Kendine Güven ve Güç Elde Etmenin Yolları. Çev. İdil Güpgüpoğlu. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
Gilman, R., and Anderman, E. M. (2006). The relationship between relative levels of motivation and intrapersonal, interpersonal, and academic functioning among older adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 375-391.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., and Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational Motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24 (3), 175-213.
Horan, S. M., and Myers, S. A. (2009). An exploration of college instructors’ use of classroom justice, power, and behavior alternation techniques. Communication Education 58 (4), 483-496.
Hoy, W. K., and Miskel, C. G. (2010). Educational Administration-EğitimYönetimi. (Edit.: Selahattin Turan) Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
İşcan, Ö. F. (2006). Dönüştürücü/Etkileşimci liderlik algısı ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde bireysel farklılıkların rolü. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (11), 160-177.
James Jr, H. S. (2005). Why did you do that? An Economic Examination of the Effect of Extrinsic Compensation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 549-566.
Karasar, N. (1982). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel.
Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, L. R., and Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don’t like about what teachers say or do. Communication Education, 53, 40-55.
Kreiner, G. E., and Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-27.
Lepper, M. R., Henderlong Corpus, J., and Lyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196.
Mael, F., and Ashforth B. E., (1982). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom 1: teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175-184.
Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Cazey, M. K., and Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 626-658.
Moore, K. D., (2001). Classroom Teaching Skills, Boston: McGraw Hill.
Özdemir GEFAD / GUJGEF 33(2): 269-291 (2013)
289
Morden, A. R. (1996). Principles of Management, London : McGraw-Hill.
Olkkonen, M. E., and Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organizational and work unit and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100 (2), 202-215.
Paulsel, M. L., Chory – Assad, R. M., and Dunleavy K. N. (2005). The relationship between students perception of instructor power and classroom justice. Communication Research Reports, 22, 207-215.
Pink, H. D. (2001). Nasıl Motive Oluruz? Nasıl Motive Ederiz ( Çev. L. Gökten) İstanbul: Golden Medya.
Reade, C. (2001). Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12 (8). 1269-1291.
Reyes, P. (1990). Organizational commitment of teachers. In P. Reyes (Ed.), Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity (143-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125-136.
Roach, K. D. (1999). The influence of teaching assistant willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 47, 166-182.
Sakallı, N. (2006). Sosyal Etkiler. Kim Kimi Nasıl Etkiler. Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.
Schrodt, P., Wittt, P. L., and Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56 (3), 308-332.
Spinanth, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlar, N., and Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34, 333-374.
Teven, J. J. (2007). Teacher Machiavellianism and social influence in the college classroom: Implications for measurement. Communication Research Reports, 24, 341-352.
Teven, J. J., and Herring, J. (2005). Instructor influence in the classroom: A preliminary investigation of perceived instructor power, credibility, and student satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 22, 235-246.
Öğretim Elemanlarının Kullandıkları Güç Kaynakları…
290
Tichy, N. M. and Sherman, S. (1994). Control Your Own destiny or Someone Else Will, New York: Harper Buniness.
Turman, P., and Schrodt, P. (2006). Student perception of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265-279.
Tüzin, İ. K., Çağlar, İ. (2008). Örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramı ve iletişim etkinliği ilişkisi. Journal of Yaşar University, 2 (9), 1011-1027.
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125.
Van Knippenberg, D., and Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5), 571-584.
Van Knippenberg, D., and Van Schie, C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73 (2), 137-147.
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294-318.
Wayne, K. H. ve Cecil G. M. (2010). Eğitim Yönetimi.( Edit. Selahattin Turan) Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Yazıcı, H. (2008). “Motivasyon” Eğitim Psikolojisi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com