You are here

ORGANİZASYONLARDA KONTROL ALGILAMALARININ ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME VE İŞ PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ

Share
The Effect Of Control On Organizational Identification And Job Performance
Author NameFaculty of Author

Journal Name:

Volume:

Publication Year:

Number:

Sayfa Aralığı:: 
251-269

Publication Language:

Abstract (Original Language): 
İş performansının arttırılmasında etkili olan pek çok faktör bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada karar kontrol ve süreç kontrol algılarının çalışanların örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansı üzerindeki etkilerinin bir model yardımıyla incelenmesi yöntemi esas alınmıştır. Çalışmada her bir değişkenin birbiri ile olan ilişkileri ortaya konulan hipotezler vasıtası ile incelenmiş ve modelin uyumluluğu yapısal eşitlik modeli yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Bankacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren örneklem üzerinde uyumluluk testleri yapılarak modelin hedef örneklem üzerindeki geçerliliği tartışılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, çalışanların süreç kontrol algılarının örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerini ve örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerinin iş performanslarını pozitif ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Analiz edilen Yapısal eşitlik modelinin uyum indeksleri incelendiğinde modelin kabul edilebilir bir model olduğu belirlenmiştir
Abstract (2. Language): 
There are a lot of factors which are effective on increasing the job performance. The present study aims to examine the effects of the perceptions of decision control and process control on employees’ organizational identification and job performance via a model. In the study, the relations of all variables with each other are examined through some determined hypothesis and the compatibility of the model is analyzed via structural equation model. The validity of the mentioned model is discussed by applying compatibility tests on an experimental group which belongs to financing sector. As a result, it is determined that process control perception of the employees has an effect on the organizational identification levels, and organizational identification levels give influence over job performances in a positive and meaningful way as well. By examining the compatibility indexes, structural equation model is identified as an acceptable model.

REFERENCES

References: 

1. AKAL, Z., (2003), Performans Kavramları ve Performans Yönetimi, MPM,
Ankara.
2. ASHFORTH, B.E. ve F. MAEL (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the
Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3. BANDURA A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought And Action. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. BARON, R. M. ve D. A. KENNY (1986). “The Moderator Mediator Variable
Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and
Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
51, ss.1173-1182.
5. BHATTACHARYA, R., (1998), “A Formal Model of Trsut Based on Outcomes”,
Academy of Management Review, 23:3.
6. BORMAN, W. C. ve S. J. MOTOWIIDLO (1993), ”Expanding The Criterion
Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance”, (Ed.), Schmitt, N.
ve Borman, W.C. Personnel Selection in Organizations, San Francisco, Ca:
Jossey-Bass, ss. 71–98.
7. BRASHEAR, B. ve S. ZINTA (2005), “Fairness Reduces the Negative Effects of
Organizational Politics on Turnover Intentions, Citizenship Behavior and Job
Performance”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2,
8. BRASHEARA T. G., C. MANOLIS ve C. M. BROOKSC (2005), “The Effects of
Control, Trust, and Justice On Salesperson Turnover” , Journal of Business
Research 58,ss. 241– 249.
9. CAMPBELL, J. P. (1990), “Modeling The Performance Prediction Problem in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology” (Ed.) Dunnette, M. D. ve Hough,
10. L. M. 2nd (Ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1.
Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., ss. 687−732,
11. CARMELI, A., G. GILAT ve D.A. WALDMAN (2007) “The Role of Perceived
Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and
Job Performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 44:6.
12. DOMEYER, D. (1998), “Building and Maintaining Employee Motivation”,
Women in Business, 50(6).
13. ELLIOT, A.J. ve T.M. THRASH (2002), “Approach-Avoidance Motivation in
Personality: Approach and Avoidance Temperaments and Goals”, Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 825.
14. ELLIOT, A.J. ve M.A. CHURCH (1997), “A Hierarchical Model of Approach and
Avoidance Achievement Motivation”, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 721.
15. FOLGER, R. ve R.S. CROPANZANO (1998). Organizational Justice and Human
Resource Management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
16. FRONE, M.R. ve K.V. FINN (2001), “Academic Performance and
Cheating:Moderating Role of School Identification and Self- Efficacy”, The
Journal of Eductional Research.
17. GIACOBBE-MİLLER, J., (1995), “A Test of The Group Values and Control
Models of Procedural Justice From The Competing Perspectives of Labor
and Management”, Personal Psychology, 48(1):115–42.
18. HOGAN, R., ve D. A SHELTON (1998) “Socioanalytic Perspective on Job
Performance”, Human Performance, 11, ss.129–144.
19. HORNGREN, C.T., G. FOSTER ve S.M., DATAR (2002), Cost Accounting: A
Managerial Emphasis, 11 Prentice- Hall, 11th (Ed.) USA.
20. JALAJAS, D.S. ve M. BOMMER (1999), “The Influence of Job Motivation
Versus Downsizing on Individual Behavior”, Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 10(4).
21. JORESKOG, K. G. ve D. SORBOM (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation
Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific
International Software.
22. KOMINIS, G. ve C. R. EMMANUEL (2007), “The Expectancy–Valence Theory
Revisited: Developing An Extended Model of Managerial Motivation”,
Management Accounting Research, 18.
23. KABAK, M. ve Ö. TURUNÇ (2008). “Günümüzde Çalışanları Motive Eden
Faktörler: Özel Sektör Motivasyon Önceliklerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi
Yöntemiyle Belirlenmesi”, KHO Bilim Dergisi, Cilt:18, s.2, ss.168-191.
24. KAPLAN, R.S. ve A.A. ATKINSON (1998), Advanced Management Accounting,
3 Prentice-Hall, Third (Ed.) USA.
25. KEH, H. T. ve Y. XIE (2009), “Corporate Reputation And Customer Behavioral
Intentions: The Roles of Trust, Identification And Commitment Industrial”,
Marketing Management, 38, ss. 732–742
26. KIRKMAN, B. L. ve B. ROSEN, (1999), ” Beyond Self-Management:
Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment”, Academy of
Management Journal, Vol. 42 Issue 1, s. 58-74.
27. KLINE, R. B., (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
New York: The Guilford Press.
28. KREINER G.E. ve B.E. ASHFORTH, (2004), “Evidence Toward an Expanded
Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 25:1.
29. LANDY, F. J., ve J. L. FARR (1983), The Measurement of Work Performance.
Orlando, Fl: Academic Pres,
30.
31. MAEL ,F. ve L.E. TETRICK (1992), “Identifying Organizational Identification”,
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.
32. MAEL, F. ve B. ASHFORTH (1992), “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial
Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal
of Organizational Behavior, Vol 13;103-123.
33. MCCLELLAND, D.C. ve R. BOYATZIS (1984), “Leadership Motive Pattern and
Long- Term Success in Management” içinde Spielberger, C.D. Motives,
Personality, and Society: Selected Papers. New York: Praeger.
34. MCLIROY, K. (1997), “Motivating Your Staff: it”s Simply Difficult”,
Management Accounting, 75(4).
35. MILLER, M. L., (1989), “Process and Decision Control in the Work Place:
Separate Effects, Independence From Distributive Justice, and Tests of
Explanatory Mechanisms”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(4),
337-354
36. MOTOWIDLO, S. J., (2003), Job Performance. Inw. Borman, Ilgen, D. ve
Klimoski, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, 12,Hoboken, Nj: John Wiley and Sons, ss.39−53.
37. MURPHY, K. R. ve J. N. CLEVELAND,(1995), Understanding Performance
Appraisal, Social, Organizational and Goal Based Perspectives, Sage Pub.
London, s.16.
38. PERRY, M.L., C.L. PEARCE ve H.P. SIMS (1999), “Empowered Selling Teams:
How Shared Leadership Can Contribute to Selling Team Outcomes”,
Journal Pers Sell Sales Management, 19(3), ss.35– 51.
39. PLOTKIN, H. M. (1987), “What Makes A Successful Salesperson?” Training and
Development Journal, ss.54–56,
40. ROUSSEAU, D. M., ve P. J. MCLEAN (1993), The Contracts of Individuals and
Organizations. (Ed.), Cummings, L. L. ve Staw, B. M., Research in
Organizational Behavior Vol. 15, Greenwich, Ct: Jai Pres, ss. 1–43.
41. SCOTT, S.G. ve V.R. LANE (2000), “A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational
Identity”, Academy of Management Review,25 :1 ,43-62.
42. SEKARAN, U., (1992), Research Methods for Business., Canada: John Wiley
&Sons, Inc.
43. SIGLER, T.H. ve C. M. PEARSON (2000), ”Creating An Empowering Culture:
Examining The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and
Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, Vol.5,
ss.27-52.
44. SMITDHS, A. A. PRYUN ve C.B.M. VAN RIEL (2001), “The Impact of
Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on
Organizational Identification”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5,
1051-1062.
45. STUMPF, S.A. ve K. HARTMAN (1984), “Individual Exploration to
Organizational Commitment Or Withdrawal”, Academy of Management
Journal, 27(2).
46.
47. ŞİMŞEK, Ö. F., (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve
Lisrel Uygulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.
48. THIBAUT, J. ve L. WALKER (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological
Analysis, Hillsdale, Nj: Erlbaum,
49. TOMPKINS, P.K. ve G. CHENEY (1983), “Account Analysis of Organization:
Decision Making and I dentification”, Putnam, L.L. ve Pacanowski, M.E.
(Ed.). Communication and Organization: An Interpretive Approach, Beverly
Hills, CA:Sage, 123-146.
50. TÜZÜN, İ. K., (2006), Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Kimlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme
İlişkisi; Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi
Üniversitesi, Ankara,
51. TYLER, T.R, (1989), ”The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of The Group
Values Model”, Journal Pers Soc Psychol, 57 (5), ss.830 –838 .
52. VAN KNIPPENBERG, D. ve E.C.M. VAN SCHIE (2000), “Foci Correlates of
Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 73, 137-147.
53. WALUMBWA, F. O., B. J. AVOLIO ve W. ZHU (2008), “How Transformatıonal
Leadership Weaves Its Influence on Individual Job Performance: The Role of
Identification and Effıcacy Beliefs”, Personnel Psychology, 61, 793–825.
54. WANG, G. ve R. G. NETEMEYER (2002), “The Effects of Job Autonomy,
Customer Demandingness, and Trait Competitiveness on Salesperson
Learning, Self-Efficacy, and Performance”, Journal of The Academy of
Marketing Science, 30, 3, 217–228,
55. WHITNER, E.M., Brodt, S.E., M.A. KORSGAARD ve J.M. WERNER (1998),
“Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for
Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior”, Academic Management
Review (3), ss. 513– 30.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com