SAĞLIKLI VE RİNİT’Lİ HASTALARDA METAKOLİN PROVOKASYONU İLE NAZAL HİPERREAKTİVİTENİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Makale İçerik Bilgileri
Makale Dili: 
Türkçe
Anahtar Kelimeler: 
Rinit
metakolin nazal provokasyonu
nazal hiperreaktivite
Türkçe Özet: 

Bu çalışmada 97 hasta ve 20 sağlıklı kişide metakolinin nazal hiperreaktiviteye yol açabil-me ve sağlıklı-hasta ayırımı yapma bilme yetisi araştırıldı. Provokasyon sonrası kontrol ve has-ta grupları arasında NAR (nasal airway resis-tance) değerleri anlamlı farklılık göstermedi (p>0.05). Provokasyon sonu NAR değeri ve skor arasında korelasyon bulundu. Metakolin provokasyonu hiçbir grupta anlamlı pozitif provokasyon düzeyi oluşturmadı. Metakolin NAR değerlerinde sağladığı artışı sağlıklı kontrol grubunda da oluşturduğu için hasta-sağlıklı ayırımı yapabilme gücü yetersiz kaldı. Metakolin anlamlı nazal reaktivite atışına yol açamadı.

Key Words: 
Rhinitis
nasal metacholine provocation
nasal hyperreactivity
İngilizce Özet: 

In the present study, metacholine power is investigated for the trigger of nasal hyperreactivity and achievement of healthy-ill selection at the 97 diseased and 20 healthy person. After provocation, there was no significant difference in NAR (nasal airway resistance) measurements between control and patient groups (p>0.05). There was a correlation between NAR measurement and score at the end of the provocation. There was no significant positive provocation level in any groups with metacholine provocation. Achievement of healthy-ill selection of the metacholine is inadequate because of that the increment of the NAR measurements was also seen at the healthy control group. Metacholine could not trigger a significant nasal reactivity increment.

Yazar Bilgileri
1. Yazar
Yazar Adı: 
Rauf TAHAMİLER
Yazar Ünvanı: 
Doktor
Yazar Üniversitesi: 
İstanbul Üniversitesi
Yazar Fakültesi: 
Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi
Yazar Anabilim Dalı: 
Kulak Burun Boğaz
2. Yazar
Yazar Adı: 
Salih ÇANAKÇIOĞLU
Yazar Ünvanı: 
Profesör
Yazar Üniversitesi: 
İstanbul Üniversitesi
Yazar Fakültesi: 
Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi
Yazar Anabilim Dalı: 
Kulak Burun Boğaz
Makale Künye Bilgisi
Makalenin Yayımlandığı Dergi: 
Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi
Makale Yayın Yılı: 
2005
Cilt/Sayı: 
36
Sayı: 
1
Sayfa Aralığı: 
20-25
Referanslar: 

1. Bienenstock J, Befus AD, Pearce F, et al. Mast cell heterogeneity: Derivation and function, with emphasis on the intestine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982; 70: 407-10.
2. Bisgaard H, Olsson P, Bende M. Leukotriene D4 increases nasal blood flow in humans. Prostaglandins 1984; 27: 599-604.
3. Borum P. Nasal methacoline challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1979; 63: 253-7.
4. Dokic D, Jovanovic SA, et al. Diagnosis of nasal allergy to the house dust mite. Rhinology 1991; 29: 117-123.
5. Gerth Van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Comparison of nasal responsiveness to histamine, methacholine and phentolamine in allergic rhinitis patients and controls. Clin Allergy 1987; 17: 563-570.
Ocak-Mart 2005 METAKOLİN VE NAZAL HİPERREAKTİVİTE; TAHAMİLER VE ÇANAKÇIOĞLU
25
6. Gerth Van Wijk R, Mulder PGH, Dieges PH. Nasal provocation with histamine in allergic rhinitis patients: Clinical significance and reproductbility. Clin Exp Allergy 1989; 19: 293-298.
7. Gerth Van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal hyper-responsivenes to histamine, methacholine and phentolamine in patients with perrennial non-allergic rhinitis and in patients with infectios rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 133-137.
8. Gerth Van Wijk R, Dieges PH. Nasal reactivity to histamine and methacholine: Two different forms of upper airway responsivennes. Rhinology 1994; 32: 119-122.
9. Wihl JA, Malm L. Rhinomanometry in routine allergen challenge Clin Otolaryngol 1985; 10: 185-189.
10. Bousquet J, Calvayrac P, Gunerin B, et al. Immunoterapy with a Standartized Dernatophagoides ptersnssinnus extact. 1. invivo and vitro parameters after a short course odf treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985; 76: 734-744.
11. Mygind N. Mediators of nasal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982; 70: 149-159.
12. Klainer M, Orange RP, Austen KF. Immunological release of histamine and slow reacting subtance of anaphylaxis from human lung: IV. Enhancement by cholinergic and alpha adrenergic stimulation. J Exp Med 1972; 136: 556-567.
13. Britton MG, Empey DW, John GC, et al. Histamine challenge and an nasal rhinometry. Their use in the assessment of psueduephedrine-ephedrine and tripolidine as nasal decongastants in subject with hay fever. Br J Clin Pharmac 1987; 6: 51-58.
14. Clement P, Stop AP, Kaufman L. Histamine thershıid and nasal hyperreactivity in nonspecific allergic rhinopathy. Rhinology 1985; 23: 32-42.
15. Okuda M, Hipointen O, Sakaguchi K, et al. Nasal histamine sensitivity in allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy 1983; 51: 51-55.
16. Gronborg H, Borum P, Mygind N. Histamine and methacholine do not increase nasal reactivity. Clin Allergy 1986; 16: 597-602.
17. Mygind N, Secher C, Kirkegaard J. Role of histamine and antihistamines in the nose. Eur J Respir Dis 1983; 64 (suppl 128): 16-20.
18. Baroody FM, Wagenmann M, Naclerio RM. Comparison of the secretory response of the nasal mucousa to methacholine and histamine. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2661-2671.
19. Wihl JA, Mygind N. Studies on the allergen – challenged human nasal mucosa. Acta orolaryngol (stochk) 1977; 84: 281-6.
20. Wihl JA, Peterson BN, Peterson LN, et al. Effect of nonsedative H1- receptor antagonist in perennial allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985; 75: 270-7.
21. Wihl JA. Methods of assessing nasal reactivity. Eur J Respir Dis 1984; 64 (supll 128): 175-9.
22. Corrado OJ, Gould CAL, Kassab JY, et al. Nazal respons of rhinitic and non-rhinitic subjects to histamine and methacoline: A comparative study. Thorax 1986; 41: 863-868.
23. Doyle WJ, Boehems, Skoner DP. Physiologic responses to intranasal dose-response challenge with histamine, methacholine, bradykinin ans prostaglandin in adult volunteers with and without nasal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 924-935.
24. Saengpanich S, Assanasen P, de Tineo M, et al. Effects of intranasal Azelastin on the response to nasal allergen challenge. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 47-52
25. Holopanene E, Tarkianen E, Malmberg H. Nasal challenge. Rhinology 1976; 14: 181-188.
26. Alvarez-Puebla MJ, Garcia-Figueroa BE, Tabar-Purroy AI, et al. Discriminant analysis in allergic rhinitis and asthma:methacholine dose-response slope allows a good differentiation between mild asthma and rhinitis. Respir Med 2003; 97: 30-6.

Türkiye’nin ilk İşletme Fakültesi olan İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi bir ilke daha imza atmaya hazırlanıyor. Arastirmax.com "1. Liselerarası İşletme ve Ekonomi Proje Yarışması"nın sponsorlarından biri olmaktan gurur duymakta.