İlköğretim Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Düşünme Stilleri Profili Açısından İncelenmesi

Makalenin İngilizce İsmi: 
The Investigation of the Thinking Styles Profile of Students in the Department of Elementary Education
Makale İçerik Bilgileri
Makale Dili: 
Türkçe
Anahtar Kelimeler: 
Düşünme stilleri
akademik başarı ve öğretmen adayları özellikleri
Türkçe Özet: 

Bu çalışma ile üç amaca ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Bunlardan birincisi ilköğretim bölümü
öğretmen adaylarının düşünme stilleri profilini araştırmaktır. İkincisi düşünme stilleri
ile akademik başarı ilişkisini incelemektir. Üçüncüsü ise öğretmen adaylarına ilişkin
bazı demografik ve psikososyal özellikler ile düşünme stilleri arasındaki ilişkiyi test
etmektir. Araştırmaya Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nde çeşitli anabilim
dallarında öğrenim gören toplam 488 birinci (260) ve dördüncü (228) sınıf öğrencisi
(343 kız ve 141 erkek) katılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının genel olarak
birinci tip düşünme stillerini kullanma eğiliminde olduklarını göstermiştir. Ayrıca
yasama, hiyerarşik, local, dışsal ve muhafazakar düşünme stilinin akademik başarı ile
ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bunlara ek olarak, araştırmada belirli düşünme stillerinin
incelenen öğrenci özellikleri ile anlamlı düzeyde ilişkili olduğu da görülmüştür.
Çalışmada, elde edilen bulgular ve doğurguları öğretim, öğrenme ve değerlendirme
açısından tartışılmıştır.

Key Words: 
Thinking styles
academic achievement and student teachers’ characteristics
İngilizce Özet: 

This study was designed to achieve three objectives. The first was to investigate the
thinking styles profile of student teachers at the department of elementary education.
The second was to examine the relationship between thinking styles and academic
achievement. The third objective was to investigate the relationships between thinking
styles as assessed by TSI and a number of student teachers’ background characteristics.
A total of 488 first (260) and fourth (228) grade student teachers (343 female and 141
male) studying in different subject area at the Faculty of Education in Pamukkale
University, Denizli, participated to the study. The results of the study showed that the
student teachers generally are in a tendency to use more the first type thinking styles. It
was also found that legislative, hierarchic, local, external and conservative thinking
styles were related with academic achievement. Moreover, the findings indicated
significant relationships between certain thinking styles and examined student teachers’
characteristics. The results and their implications for teaching, learning and assessment
in the classroom were discussed.

Yazar Bilgileri
1. Yazar
Yazar Adı: 
Mustafa BULUŞ
Yazar Ünvanı: 
Yardımcı Doçent
Yazar Üniversitesi: 
Pamukkale Üniversitesi
Yazar Fakültesi: 
Eğitim Fakültesi
Yazar E-posta: 
mbulus@pau.edu.tr
Makale Künye Bilgisi
Makalenin Yayımlandığı Dergi: 
Ege Ünivesitesi Ege Eğitim Dergisi/Ege Eğitim Online
Makale Yayın Yılı: 
2005
Cilt/Sayı: 
1
Sayı: 
6
Sayfa Aralığı: 
1-24
PDF Dosyası: 
application/pdf iconarastirmax_1435_pp_1-24.pdf
Makalenin Yayınlandığı Web Sitesindeki Linki: 
Makaleyi Dergi Web Sitesinden İndirin
Referanslar: 

1. Amato, P., ve Ochiltree, G. (1986). Family resources and the development of child
2. competence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 47-56.
3. Anderson, M., ve Hughes, H. (1989). Parenting attitudes and self-esteem of young
4. children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 463-465.
5. Balkıs, M. ve Işıker, B. G. (2005). The relationship between thinking styles and
6. personality types. International Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 33 3, 283-294.
7. Bernardo, A. B. I.; Zhang, L. F., ve Callueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic
8. achievement among Filipino students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163 2, 149-
9. 163.
10. Buluş, M. (2001). Eğitimde Gözardı Edilen Bir Konu: Düşünme Stilleri. Yaşadıkça Eğitim,
11. Sayı 72, 2-7.
12. Buluş, M. (2006). Assessment of Thinking Styles Inventory, Academic Achievement and
13. Student Teachers’ Characteristics, Eğitim ve Bilim, Ocak sayısı.
14. Cano-Garcia, F., ve Hewitt Hughes, E. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis
15. of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational
16. Psychology, 20 4, 413-432.
17. Cohen, D., Dibble, E., ve Grawe, J. (1977). Companion instrument for measuring
18. childrens’ competence and parental style. Archives of Genetic Psychiatry, 30, 805-815.
19. Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. Erıc Document,
20. p. 185.
21. Duru, E. (2004). Düşünme Stilleri: Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Çerçeve. Eğitim Araştırmaları,
22. Sayı 15.
23. Field, D. (1988). Family Personalities. Oregon: Harvest House Publishers.
24. Gonzalez, A., Greenwood, G., ve WenHsu, J. (2001). Undergraduate students’ goal
25. orientations and their relationship to perceived parenting style. College Student
26. Journal, 35 2, 182-193.
27. Grigorenko, E. L., ve Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic
28. performance. Exceptional Children, 63 3, 295-312.
29. Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive Styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7,
30. 251-268.
31. Neal, J. ve Frick-Horbury, D. (2001). The effects of parenting styles and childhood
32. attachment patterns on intimate relationships. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28 3,
33. 178-184.
34. Olson, S. L., Bates, J. E., ve Bayles, K. (1990). Early antecedents of childhood impulsivity:
35. The role of parent-child interaction, cognitive competence, and temperament. Journal
36. of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 317-334.
37. Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., ve Dodge, K. A. (1997). Supportive parenting, ecological context,
38. and children’s adjustment: A 7-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 68, 908-
39. 923.
40. Pianta, R., Nimetz, S., ve Bennett, E. (1997). Mother-child relationships, teacher-child
41. relationships, and school outcomes on preschool and kindergarten. Early Childhood
42. Research Quarterly, 12, 263-280.
43. Reynolds, A. (1992). Comparing measures of parental involvement and their effects on
44. academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 441-462.
45. Rıdıng, R., ve Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration.
46. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
47. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their
48. development, Human Development, 31, 197-224.
49. Sternberg, R. J. (1994a). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between
50. intelligence and personality, in: R. J. STERNBERG and P. RUZGIS (Eds) Intelligence
51. and Personality, 169-187. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Sternberg, R. J. (1994b). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52 3, 36-
53. 40.
54. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Sternberg, R. J., ve Grigorenko, E. L. (1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review,
56. 16 2, 122-130.
57. Sternberg, R. J., ve Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European
58. Journal for High Ability, 6, 201-219.
59. Sternberg, R. J., ve Wagner, R. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory, Unpublished test.
60. Yale University.
61. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Third Edition,
62. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
63. Thompson, J. (2004). A Monte Carlo comparision of tests for the number of factors under
64. alternative factor models. Ph D. University of California.
65. Warash, B. G., ve Markstrom, C. A. (2001). Parental perceptions of parenting styles in
66. relation to academic self-esteem of preschoolers. Education, 121 3, 485-494.
67. Yıldırım, A. (1997). Gender role influences on Turkish adolescents’ self-identity.
68. Adolescence,3 22.
69. Zhang, L. F. (1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental selfgoverment.
70. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 133 2, 165-181.
71. Zhang, L. F. (2000a). Are thinking styles and personality types related?. Educational
72. Psychology, 20 3, 271-284.
73. Zhang, L. F. (2000b). Relationship between thinking styles inventory and study process
74. questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 841-856.
75. Zhang, L. F. (2001a). Thinking styles and personality types revisited. Personality and
76. Individual Differences, 31 6, 883-894.
77. Zhang, L. F. (2001b). Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. The Journal of
78. Psychology, 135 5, 547-561.
79. Zhang, L. F. (2001c). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences.
80. International Journal of Psychology, 36 2, 100–107.
81. Zhang, L. F. (2001d). Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond selfrated
82. abilities. The Journal of Psychology, 135 6, 621-637.
83. Zhang, L. F. (2002a). Measuring thinking styles ın addition to measuring personality
84. traits?. Personality and Individual Differences, 33 3, 445-458.
85. Zhang, L. F. (2002b). Thinking styles and cognitive development. The Journal of Genetic
86. Psychology, 163 2, 179-195.
87. Zhang, L. F. (2002c). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and
88. academic performance. Educational Psychology, 22 3, 331-348.
89. Zhang, L. F. (2002d). Thinking styles and the Big Five Personality traits. Educational
90. Psychology, 22, 17-31.
91. Zhang, L. F. (2002e). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implications for education
92. and research. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 245-261.
93. Zhang, L. F. (2003). Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions,
94. Journal of Psychology, 137 6.
95. Zhang, L. F., ve Huang, J. F. (2001). Thinking styles and the five-factor model of
96. personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 465-476.
97. Zhang, L. F., ve Postiglione, G. A. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socioeconomic
98. status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31 8, 1333-1346.
99. Zhang, L. F., ve Sachs, J. (1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental selfgovernment:
100. A Hong Kong validity study. Psychological Reports, 81, 915-928.
101. Zhang, L. F., ve Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic
102. achievement among Hong Kong university students. Educational Research Journal, 13,
103. 41-62.
104. Zhang, L. F., ve Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles
105. related? A study in two Chinese Populations. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary
106. and Applied, 134 5, 469-490.
107. Zhang, L. F., ve Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teachers’ characteristics.
108. International Journal of Psychology, 37 1, 3-12.

Türkiye’nin ilk İşletme Fakültesi olan İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi bir ilke daha imza atmaya hazırlanıyor. Arastirmax.com "1. Liselerarası İşletme ve Ekonomi Proje Yarışması"nın sponsorlarından biri olmaktan gurur duymakta.