DURGUN DURUM BÜYÜMEDEN İÇSEL BÜYÜMEYE

Makalenin İngilizce İsmi: 
From Steady State Growth to Endogenous Growth
Makale İçerik Bilgileri
Makale Dili: 
Türkçe
Anahtar Kelimeler: 
büyüme
İçsel Büyüme
sermaye
Bilgi
Ar-Ge
Türkçe Özet: 

Bu çalışmada neoklasik durgun durum (Solowyan) büyüme modeli ile içsel büyüme
modelleri (Lucas’ın beşeri sermaye, Rivera-Batiz ve Romer’in Ar-Ge modeli)
karşılaştırılmaktadır. Azalan verimlere dayalı neoklasik büyüme modelinde zengin ülkeler
zamanla durgun duruma girmekte ve onların gelişme yolunu takip eden yoksul ülkeler
onları yakalamaktadır. Oysa içsel büyüme modelinde aynı bilgi aynı anda birden çok
üretim alanında kullanılabildiği ve yoksul ülkelerden zengin ülkelere doğru beyin göçü
olduğu için, zengin ülkelerde azalan verimler ortaya çıkmamakta ve bu ülkeler durgun
duruma girmemektedir. Birbirlerinin bilgi stokundan yararlanacakları için benzer
gelişmişlik düzeyine sahip ülkeler arasındaki entegrasyon yararlı görülmektedir. Bu
modelde devlet bilgi, beşeri sermaye ve teknolojik gelişmeye yapacağı olumlu katkılar
yüzünden yeniden stratejik bir önem kazanmaktadır.

Key Words: 
growth
endogenous growth
capital
Knowledge
R&D.
İngilizce Özet: 

In this study the neoclassical steady-state (Solowian) growth model has been
compared with the endogenous growth models proposed by Lucas’s human capital model
and Rivera-Batiz and Romer’s R&D model. In the neoclassical growth model that is based
on the diminishing returns, the rich countries falling into a steady state by the time and the
poor countries that follow their growth path catch up them. Whereas, in the endogenous
growth model, diminishing returns do not come out in the rich countries and they do not
fall into a steady state, due to the specific knowledge made use of in many different
production areas at the same time and the brain drain flows to rich countries from poor
countries. Integration of countries similarly developed is considered as useful since they
benefit from each others’ knowledge stock. The state regains the strategic importance by
adding positive contributions to knowledge, human capital and technological change in
endogenous growth models.

Yazar Bilgileri
1. Yazar
Yazar Adı: 
Osman Demir
Makale Künye Bilgisi
Makalenin Yayımlandığı Dergi: 
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Makale Yayın Yılı: 
2002
Cilt/Sayı: 
3
Sayı: 
1
Sayfa Aralığı: 
1-15
PDF Dosyası: 
application/pdf iconarastirmax_1922_pp_1-15.pdf
Referanslar: 

Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, second
printing, the MIT press, Cambridge, London, England.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1994), “The Production and Distribution of Knowledge”, in
The Economics of Growth and Technical Change, Gerald Silverberg and Luc Soete
(ed), Edward Elgar Publishing, England; 9-20.
Domar, E. (1970), “Capital Expansion and Growth”, in Growth Economics, Amartya
Sen (ed), Penguin Modern Economics Selected Readings, Penguin Books,
Harmondsworth Middlesex, England, 1970; 65-77.
Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman (1994), “Endogenous Innovation in the
Theory of Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 8, Number 1, Winter
1994; 23-44.
Harrod, R. F. (1970), “Dynamic Theory”, in Growth Economics, Amartya Sen (ed),
Penguin Modern Economics Selected Readings, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Middlesex, England, 1970; 43-64.
Lau, L. J. (1996), “The Sources of Long Term Economic Growth: Observations from
the Experience of Developed and Developing Countries” in The Mosaic of Economic
Growth, R. Landau, T. Taylor and G. Wrigths (eds), Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Lucas, R. E. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of
Monetary Economics, 22, North-Holland; 3-42.
Mankiw, N. Gregory, David Romer and D. N. Weil (1992), “A Contribution to the
Empirics of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1992; 407-37.
Ochaa, Orlando O. (1996), Growth, Trade and Endogenous Technology: A Study of
OECD Manufacturing, New York , St. Martin Press.
OECD (1998), Economic Outlook, June 1998.
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. and Paul M. Romer (1991a), “International Trade with
Endogenous Technological Change”, European Economic Review, North Holland,
35 (1991); 971-1004.
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. and Paul M. Romer (1991b), “Economic Integration and
Endogenous Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1991; 531-55.
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres (1999), “Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse
Societies: Economic Performance in Europe”, Growth and Change, Vol. 30
(Winter 1999); 75-105.
Romer, David (1996), Advanced Macroeconomics, The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Romer, Paul M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of
Political Economy, 94(5); 1002-37.
Romer, Paul M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political
Economy, 98-5, Sp. Issue; S71-S102.
Romer, Paul M. (1994), “The Origins of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Economic
Perspectives, vol: 8, num: 1; 3-22.
Sengupta, Jati K. (1999), New Growth Theory: An Applied Perspective, Edward Elgar,
Cheltanham.
Shaw, G. K. (1992), “Policy Implications of Endogenous Growth Theory”, The
Economic Journal, 102 (412); 611-21.
Solow, Robert M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70; 65-94.
Taymaz, Erol (1993), “Sanayi ve Teknoloji Politikaları: Amaçlar ve Araçlar”,
ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt 20; 549-580.
Temple, Jonathan (1999), “A Positive Effect of Human Capital on Growth”,
Economic Letters 65, Elsevier Science; 131034).
Wong, Kar-yiu and Chong Kee Yip (1999), “Education, Economic Growth, and
Brain Drain”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23 (1999); 699-726.
World Bank (1998/1999), World Development Report: Knowledge for
Development.

Türkiye’nin ilk İşletme Fakültesi olan İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi bir ilke daha imza atmaya hazırlanıyor. Arastirmax.com "1. Liselerarası İşletme ve Ekonomi Proje Yarışması"nın sponsorlarından biri olmaktan gurur duymakta.